 |
|
Contests; For the Independence of the Federal Judiciary Under Article Three, Section One of the Constitution of the United States Made by Walter Evans ... Judges, Next as to Diminution of Their Comp
Walter Evans
Paperback. General Books LLC 2012-02-02.
ISBN 9781150436147
|
|
|
|
Hitta bokens lägsta pris
|
Förlagets beskrivning
This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1920. Excerpt: ... SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. OCTOBER TERM, 1919. No. 654. WALTER EVANS, Plaintiff-in-error, versus J. ROGERS GORE, Defendant-in-error. MEMORANDUM OP POINTS AND ADDITIONAL AUTHORITIES. . Art. 3, Sec. 1, forbids diminution of a judge's salary during his term of office, and the law forbids a thing done indirectly which is forbidden to be done directly. Brown vs. Maryland, 12 Wheat., 410. Weston vs. Charleston, 2 Pet., 449. Cummings vs. Missouri, 4 Wall., 288. Coke, 2 Inst., 48, 202. Broom, Legal Max., p. 367. Burrill Law Diet., citing Coke, supra, and Broom, 202. Favrbank vs. V. S., 181 U. S., 283. In Brown vs. Maryland the court.-'aid: "All must perceive that a tax on the sale of an article imported only for sale is a tax on the article itself. It it true this State may tax occupations generally, but this tax must be paid by those who employ.the individual, or is a tax on his business ." In Weston vs. Charleston--Held That a tax on income of Government securities was a tax on the securities. In Cummings vs. Missouri--Held That a result inadmissible could not be reached by indirect method of a test oath. In 2 Coke, Inst., 48, the maxim Quando aliquid prohibetur, prohibetur et omne, per quod devenitwr ad illud. is expounded. See, also, Quando aliquid prohibetur ex Direvto, prohibetvjr et per obliquum. Coke Litt., 223. Woodruff vg. Farham, 8 Wall., 123, is cited in Fairbank vs. U S., as follows: "In other words, that decision affirms the great principle that what cannot be done directly because of unconstitutional restriction cannot be accomplished indirectly by legislation which accomplishes the same result. But that principle is not dependent, alone upon the case cited. It was recognized long anterior thereto in Brown vs. Maryland, 12 Wheat., 419. "
Fler böcker av Walter Evans
Liknande böcker
Recensioner
Den här boken har tyvärr inte några recensioner ännu. Om du redan läst boken, skriv en recension!
Recensera boken
Skriv en recension och dela dina åsikter med andra. Försök att fokusera på bokens innehåll. Läs våra instruktioner för mer information.
Contests; For the Independence of the Federal Judiciary Under Article Three, Section One of the Constitution of the United States Made by Walter Evans ... Judges, Next as to Diminution of Their Comp
Bokrecensioner » Contests; For the Independence of the Federal Judiciary Under Article Three, Section One of the Constitution of the United States Made by Walter Evans ... Judges, Next as to Diminution of Their Comp
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
